Chronology of events matters when we are representing history especially through a timeline. Chronology refers to the arrangement of events or dates in the order of their occurrence. It is a very efficient and effective way of organizing events, especially on a timeline. It matters because it shows how history changed over time and is an easy way to analyze past events, compare them with newer events, and infer what may happen in the future. We can represent history on a time line through small descriptions with the date describing an event as well as some sort of media to help the reader visualize the event. Chronology can mean something to different to everyone. For example, chronology for Christians was vital in celebrating many religious holidays such as when to celebrate Easter and knowing that the Apocalypse was nigh.
According to “Cartographies of Time”, timelines have not always been a part of studying history. In fact, there is a history itself in studying timelines. Many people forget that we have not always had timelines as a tool to represent history. In the process of compiling media for my entry (Samuel Tippet) for the Moravian Lives Timeline, I have come to terms with the complex relationship between ideas and modes of representation. Both through words and media such as photographs, it has represented and “clarified” historical events. The description describing what has happened while the photograph can give more insight to where it happened, what it looked like, the time period and much more. “Traditional chronographic forms performed both rote historical work and heavy conceptual lifting. They assembled, selected, and organized diverse bits of historical information in the form of dated list. And the chronologies of a given period may tell us as much about its visions of past and future as do its historical narratives.” (Grafton 11) In the first timelines assembled, there were a list of dates. However, many of these dates were missing the events that coincided with them.
A line or timeline tells more than chronology. It tells a story. Since the first timelines were created, a lot of pieces were missing. Transcribing artifacts as we have been doing in class can help add more information and piece together certain events in history. A ‘line’ has appeared everywhere. Its presence is everywhere. It is used to describe so many different aspects and subjects. For example, in history textbooks or even an analog clock. Mark Johnson and George Lakoff have argued that the linear metaphor is even at work in a digital clock, though no line is actually present.
Focusing on my group’s timeline (Samuel Tippet), he was a very dark soul and pretty religious later in life. Samuel Tippet’s life is in England during the early to mid 18th century. He was born in the parish of Britton. Throughout his life, he turned to God and religion after self-reflecting on his naughty childhood. To highlight one event, in 1754, the Disciple came to Bristol. This is when Tippet pledged his allegiance to God and used this time period to emphasize and explain why religion was so important to him. The Disciple later moved back to London. Another example following 1754 is the next year where it is a defining moment in Tippet’s life. He feels as if he was in the presence of the Lord himself. Throughout our timeline, we include both photographs that help the reader depict what his life was like and the geography of England as well as what the parishes looked like. Our timeline gives background to his occupation, birth, and other additional facts. The two modes have clarified historical events by visual and conceptual analysis. Looking at media as well as reading the description in a time like order gives the best sense to Samuel Tippet’s life.
Attached is my group’s timeline preview link.
https://timeline.knightlab.com/#preview-embed
Morgan Graning is a junior at Bucknell University. She is a political science major and sociology minor. Morgan is from Long Island, New York.