Categories
Blog #3 contextual research

Blog #2: Timelines

Image result for chronology
Chronology Pattern

 

The method utilized to represent historical data is just as important as the the information it contains. Modes of representation can determine the clarity of the information being shared and are examples of  interesting ways to analyze information. Chronology and Geography, two modes brought up by Grafton, show us the pros and cons of using certain modes of representation to present historical data/events.

Image result for geography
            The Layers of Geographical Representation

During the creation of the Timeline.js project and reading of Grafton’s work, I got to experience and learn how information and the mode of how it is represented have a close and dependent relationship. In Cartographies of Time, Grafton shows how modes of representation have progressed throughout history, highlighting the improvements and background that led to timelines. Historical data can benefit or suffer from its compilation into a timeline or its representation on a map. I definitely witnessed the benefit of each mode on the events that I pulled from my transcriptions. All timelines, the medium of chronology represented in this project, are unique and have different forms of organization. My timeline utilized contextual events in relation to the historical events in my transcription and then presented a visual in order to better support each event. The main benefit of this method is its organizational value that creates a better understanding of the historical events, both literally and contextually, for the reader. This method also makes the presentation of the data more interesting with its visuals and contextual events. Another interesting aspect of this timeline is how it has the capability of utilizing maps, a popular medium of geography, in its visuals. The main con of utilizing chronology to present historical data that I saw in this project is that the “story” can become compromised in the process of collecting the data to compile into a timeline. For instance, when scouring the transcriptions, we automatically pull the events that come with a date; in order to chronologically organize data, we feel the need for numbers. Because of our reliance upon the time, days, months, and/or years that structure the line, we sometimes fail to dive deeper into the events represented, sacrificing the “story.” Grafton points this out in his work, stating, “Our idea of time is so wrapped up in the metaphor of the line that taking them apart seem virtually impossible.” In this process, many key events in the transcription are not pulled simply because they were not attached to a specific time, day, month, or year and, in turn, are not represented and shown to the reader. Even if these events are included and compiled into the timeline, there is a compromise in accuracy; the author must then generalize the time in which the event took place. With geographical representation, events and data can also be compromised. Similarly to how events without time, day, month, or year cannot be included in timelines without being compromised, events not marked by a location cannot be geographically represented without being compromised.

After the completion of my timeline, I came to the conclusion that the modes of representation identified by Grafton are very beneficial when used to present certain data. In addition, I noticed how these modes of representation can be detrimental when used to present other data. My findings evoke the debate of whether or not the purpose of these modes is to tell a story or simply organize data. In my opinion, they do both. These modes organize the data/events in a way that we can formulate a story. As Grafton points out in his work, the author must first look past the linear when creating the timeline, and the reader must do the same if we are to utilize all of the benefits that come with timelines.  The lines of a timeline are the lives of the story; when they end, the story ends. And the visualization of the locations of the events provided by the use of geography as a mode can make sense of the data and further support the story.

LINK TO TIMELINE: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19D5MbZfE71t0zlKwUYbnZyNQD3EcQef-JETzGkvr17k/edit?usp=sharing

               Timeline visual: Mode of Geography
          Timeline Visual: 18th Century Marriage
Categories
Blog #3 contextual research

Blog #3: Timelines

The two modes of representation discussed in Grafton’s, Time in Print, are chronology and geography. By using these two modes of representation, it makes it easier for historians and researchers to piece or link together different pieces of information throughout history. Chronology allows one to determine the order of events while the geography allows one to determine where all of these events took place. The geography could help researchers determine common illnesses at that time in history or match together different groups that were in the same location at the same time. If researchers are able to determine the exact place something happened and the time it happened at, they can use this information and compare it to other information to clarify historical events.

Many times researchers have ideas about different events in history and how they are related. Researchers are able to use the two modes of representation, chronology and geography, to link together these events. Suppose there was a crime committed and there are two people in question. The detectives could use information about the place of the crime scene and the time the crime was committed at. They could then do research into the actions of these two people around the time of the crime and determine how close they were to the scene. These two modes allow researchers to relate events and arrive at conclusions that were otherwise be difficult to come to. Chronology can also be used in other ways. Grafton states, “For Christians, getting chronology right was the key to any practical matters such as knowing when to celebrate Easter and weighty ones such as knowing when the Apocalypse was nigh,” (Grafton 11). This mode of representation can be used to remember when specific calendar events occur or even predict when events in the future would occur.

On the other hand, knowing the time and place of a specific event could lead to incorrect assumptions about what happened at that event. One person may have just been in the wrong place at the wrong time and not been involved in the event but been mistaken as partaking in it. Chronology and geography cannot always verify events and link together some, but it can provide useful information that will aid in arriving at a conclusion even if it is not the correct one. Although at first glance, one may not think much of a timeline, I do believe it has the ability to tell a story. Grafton writes “Our claim is that the line is a much more complex and colorful figure than it is usually thought,” (Grafton 10). As one moves down the line, they pick up more and more useful information that they can then piece together to create a story. The line is of great importance, “In the graphic arts, the same holds true: from the most ancient images to the most modern, the line serves as a central figure in the representation of time,” (Grafton 14). As one can see, the line resembles much more than just something drawn on a paper.

 

a photo of how the events line up on the timeline


 

 

 

an example of one of the events on our timeline

 

https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/timeline3/latest/embed/index.html?source=1MByvlaJQuG8LKCAz5jRj6eiHdwoiN4Iyr1o9VjHIl04&font=Default&lang=en&initial_zoom=2&height=650