Categories
Uncategorized

Blog #1

After visiting several websites based on archival materials, I realized that there are both advantages and disadvantages to creating a digital artifact. One advantage to creating a digital artifact is the fact that it is progressive. At this day in age, technology is increasingly growing and becoming more and more important to our daily lives in many respected aspects. Physical and tangible manuscripts are going ‘out of style’ because there are so many virtual tools. Another advantage is that with technology comes increased productivity and speed.

According to Jane Austen’s Fiction Manuscripts “many of the Austen manuscripts are frail; open and sustained access has long been impossible for conservation and location reasons.” Another line that stuck out to me as an advantage was “digitization at this stage in their lives not only offers the opportunity for the virtual reunification of a key manuscript resource…” What a lot of the projects have in common are that they are a collection of a bunch of manuscripts. Also, the artifacts are usually kept in an important library or museum.

Some of the disadvantages to creating a digital artifact is that it is digital. To some people, they do not like change (change being the technology in this case). Technology can be extremely helpful but also has its cons. It is expensive, takes time to learn how to figure it out, and can have bugs and crash especially when first starting up. Another huge disadvantage in my opinion is getting rid of the tangible aspect of an artifact. For example, there is no more “flipping the page”.

Are our physical and emotional relationships to our objects of study shifting in a digital age?

I think that our physical and emotional relationships to our object are both changing and staying the same. An emotional attachment and relationship to an object in my opinion does not change just because technology comes into play. However, our physical relationship with an object does change because of the tangible aspect of it going away. Reading on a screen is much different then reading off a physical object.

Do digitized materials supplant our need to view the physical originals, or enhance the necessity of and desire for archival work?

Digitized materials enhance the necessity and desire for archival work. With new technology, there is new publicity, and this is how word spreads which may create a higher desire for archival work.

Are we interacting with textual material on the screen more than on the (manuscript or printed) page, and if so, how are our research practices changing?

I think that we are interacting with textual material on the screen more than a manuscript or a printed page because a lot of the manuscripts are very old and hard to read because of the damage done to them just naturally weathering over the years. With technology becoming a bigger part of our life, it is easier to interact with the textual material as a lot of educational tools and even work-related items are online.

fintech icon on abstract financial technology background represent Blockchain and Fintech Investment Financial Internet Technology Concept.

Categories
Uncategorized

Practice Post from Tuesday

In the project that I choose was the “Database of Indigenous People in North America.” In the project, the primary Digital Humanities focus was Archive in the site itself. With Archiving it allows people to see documents, letters and other images that can be easily accessed in then site, than having someone go to specific place just to see the physical copy once. With looking over it there it has a secondary approach to this in mapping areas that have impacted by events in American History. Some of them having named locations where Natives of the Land use to settle and the territory that was assigned to them by the American Government. With the methods that were presented in this project  it can fit into a scholarly subject matter in understanding the History of the Indigenous people in a certain place and time. With having the perspectives of many people coming from newspapers, photographs, census and etc. it allows the average person connect the ideas of the past for them understand the actions of those people in the past. The determining factor that makes the digital representation to conveyed to world is by the type material that is given and the amount information one has in their disposal to explain a subject matter. One has to determine in what ways can we share this information to a audience. Some people would just publish it into a book that can only be read in a physical copy. Or there are people who rather share to a public domain that is online to capture a larger audience. Another example can be an audio recording that was captured of very important event. The ways people allow it to be heard is either going to the object and get the permission to hear it, or having a copy online that can be easily accessed by one click.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Allison Butler’s Practice Post 8/28

I chose textual analysis and visualization for my two sample projects of DH. Textual analysis is a major aspect of many of Professor Faull’s projects. For example, Transcribe Bentham is an “award winning collaborative transcription initiative, which is digitising and making available digital images of Bentham’s unpublished manuscripts through a platform…”. Additionally, textual analysis is greatly important in The Great Parchment Book. It was “…damaged as a result of a fire at Guildhall in 1786, it has been unavailable to researchers for over 200 years.” Textual analysis is also very present in Micki Kaufman’s project, “this project is an application of ‘big data’ computational text analysis techniques to research the Digital National Security Archive (DNSA)’s recently released Kissinger Collections, comprising approximately 17500 meeting memoranda (‘memcons’) and teleconference transcripts (‘telcons’)”. Visualization is also a main aspect of many projects such as SelfieCity by Professor Faull. Visualization allowed researchers to analyze cultural differences through selfies. This is extremely interesting and allows us to compare and contrast cultural norms. Visualization is also a vital part of Mapping the Republic of Letters. Visualization allows us to better understand the “…networks of correspondence that stretched across countries and continents; the social networks created by scientific academies; and the physical networks brought about by travel”.

posegrid_bangkok_.jpg

great-parchment-book-028-small.jpg

Categories
Uncategorized

Practice blog

Second Day of Class

DH is the practice of transcribing and studying the written word from less known civilizations.