Categories
Uncategorized

Blog #2

For our transcription project, we transcribed a memoir written by Elizabeth Grundy.  She wrote about her life, and how her mother died when she was young. She also mentioned how when she was married her husband died as well.  After this, her son, William, then died. She writes this memoir to tell us her difficult life and how she struggled to continue her belief in God and her faith.  My group and I transcribed her whole memoir, and throughout our process, we used Voyant tools to see how the words in the document are used and their frequency. We came up with a research question, and ours is, “How does the frequency of key terms change throughout the document?”  There are so many tools on Voyant that helped us answer this question. Three specific tools that we used that especially helped us were cirrus, streamgraph, and word tree. These three tools specialize on word frequency and that is why they were so accurate for our research. Cirrus is something that creates a word bubble based on the frequent words.  The bigger the words appear in the bubble, the most they appear in the document. This helps us to indicate the frequent words. In the Whitley reading, he also creates a cirrus called “Song of Myself”. He doesn’t call it a cirrus, he calls it a word cloud, but they are the exact same thing.  Below is an image of the cirrus that was created from our memoir words. 

The other two tools that we used that help us answer the other part of our question are stream graph and word tree.  Streamgraph shows the change of frequency for a specific word, throughout the whole document. This gives us the information we want by showing us the change throughout the memoir, instead of just in general. It also compares it to the other frequent words in that area of the document. For example, like in this quote, “Savior would raise you up even more;” she replied: “Do not keep me back, let me go freely; it will be best for me now; I want to be gone and to see my Dear Savior.”  You can see that Savior is used a lot in this certain part of the text, but right before this part, it isn’t used for a whole page. This shows how the key words change throughout the memoir. Similar to stream graph, in the Whitley reading, he mentions how he uses scatterplots to see the different patterns of data points on the different axises.  Below is an image of the streamgraph based off of the memoir.

The other tool, and the last one, that helped answer our question, was word tree, below. This tool shows the words that come before and after the key terms, or the collocate. 

This helps because it gives us the context of the key word, and it can even tell us when Elizabeth Grundy was saying at the point in the memoir.  Like in the Whitely reading, and in many other parts of writing, tools like these can be helpful for so many different things.

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Blog #2

After transcribing Samuel Tippet’s piece with my group members, we came up with a research question that we felt was appropriate. Our research question was:

How does religion and faith play a role in Samuel Tippet’s transcription?

Tippet’s piece begins with him describing himself. He was born in 1711 in the Parish of Bitton. He also describes his family life and his challenges. His father had died when he was very young, and he turned to God during this period of hardship. Personally, I think he is a little troubled and very dark because several times throughout the pieces he “wishes he was never born” and questions himself what life would be like without him. He criticizes, and self scrutinizes himself and all of the mistakes that he has made throughout his life. Throughout the piece, he describes how he turns to God because of the mistakes he had made in his earlier life.

By asking ourselves this question, it helps the reader or transcriber understand the piece more and analyze it better. When comparing our piece (Samuel Tippet) to another piece, the research question also came into play. The research question also applied to the Esther Latrobe’s memoir.

When using Voyant, each memoir’s key terms comes up. For our piece, the key terms were heart, times, time, poor, and love. For the Esther Latrobe memoir, the key terms were lord, dear, god, let and savior which is why our research question on religion pertains to their piece as well. The combined key terms for the pieces are Lord, heart, time, dear, and oh. Using Voyant, there are many tools available that help you decipher and analyzed a piece. For our piece (Samuel Tippet), it is much shorter than the Latrobe Memoir. Samuel Tippet’s piece had a little around 4,000 words (3,806 words to be exact). In our piece, there was almost no punctuation which made the words/sentence equal to 1,268. The Latrobe’s statistics are more accurate because of the use of punctuation. It was a much longer piece with 8,460 words. The words\sentence was 24.6 which seems to make a lot more sense. Using some of the tools such as terms berry, it tells the Voyant user that the word ‘God’ was used 26 times in the Latrobe memoir. Using the bubble tool, the key words that are most frequently used are the ones with biggest bubbles which makes it easy to tell and visualize instead of just reading terms off of a list. Personally, I like the visualization tools the most because it helps me understand recognize the key terms in a piece better. Other tools such as ‘Grid Tools’ seem very standard to me and have the terms in a chart. Attached, I included a few photos of the tools I used with Voyant.

 

 

 

Categories
Blog #2 Uncategorized

Esther Latrobe Voyant Tools

In Esther Latrobe’s memoir, as the reader, we learn that Esther Latrobe was born at Bristol on June 7th, 1802 into a loving family of five brothers and two parents. As she grew up she battled many illnesses such as the measles. To add to Esther’s rough upbringing, her mother passed when Esther was eleven years old. She then spent a lot of time in a dear place, Tytherton. She still had battles with illnesses such as rheumatic fever, which often required the Lord’s spirits to restore her as her medical assistants could not. Because of this attachment with her saviour she put her heart into the Lord. She had a deep connection with her faith that developed from a young age into her adulthood. Esther Latrobe then gave birth to a boy which caused her to become very sick. The way she connected with the Lord made her fear of death simmer. She felt comfort with her loved ones by her side as she faded into life with the Lord, death. She died at the age of 28.

With the use of Voyant Tools I was able to, as Frank Moretti states “step back and look at the broad patterns that emerge” (Whitley 188). These tools allowed me to see the most frequent words as well as the trends in the text. These tools gave me new perspective on the memoir including a broad view on the answer to our research question. Our research question was how did Esther Latrobe’s relationship with God affect her lifestyle, and help her recover from such illnesses and hardships. Seeing the frequency of the word “Lord” and “spirits” helped draw conclusions on how big an influence these had during this medical crisis of her life. Although it didn’t draw in specifically on how the Lord and spirits impacted her life as that would require a closer reading of her memoir, it was mentioned enough for the reader to realize that it played a big role.

 

With the ability of Voyant Tools I was able to see that the most frequent words were “lord”, “oh”, “dear”, “god” and “heart” (which is tied with “let” and “said”) respectively. Being able to see this showed what had the biggest influence in Esther’s life as she had the most to say about it. Even better, the context on Voyant Tools allows you to see to the left and right of the word which allows you to see the context of the Lord in Esther’s life. Being able to see every single occurrence of the word allows you to see much more than the human eye could pick up on. Also the list allows you to compare each occurrence of the word on a visual chart in a very efficient matter that the human could not do alone.

Using the available tools in Voyant Tools helps “identify the patterns of meaning in large and potentially unwieldy texts” (Whitley 198). Word clouds allow you to “spatially read a large body of text involving an interesting back-and-forth between close and distant reading” (Whitley 200). Having these tools helped draw large conclusions about the text which mainly relate back to her beliefs about Lord. Along with Tippett’s memoir, the Lord impacted the lives of many of this time period which shows how important religion was. “Lord” and “Saviour” were frequently used in both memoirs. Using visual tools such as bubblelines, wordcloud, cirrus, bubbles, and frequency grids provides visualizations about the text without reading the entire text. Being able to draw conclusions helps analyze not only Esther’s memoir but also all Moravian memoirs and that time period as a whole. 

Categories
Uncategorized

Assignment #1

I found transcribing these pieces of work to be a very fascinating process. I have never completed a project like this before. I think that this project has given us an incredible opportunity. We have been given the chance to create digital artifacts from real journal entries. I found this project to be very special and meaningful. I really enjoyed reading the journal entries and being able to read them felt very personal. I imagined how long ago these were written and by who. There is something very personal about interpreting someone’s journal entries, especially for the first time. There were many deep emotions that were touched on in the texts which made me feel a connection to the work.

It was great to learn about these people of the Moravian church through their writing. From their writings, they seem to be very religious. It is unbelievable to think about the circumstances under which these entries were written and how different people’s lives are today. Reading these texts and transcribing them was a very intriguing process. It was quite difficult, yet allowed me to appreciate what I was doing even moreso. There were many words I was unable to read due to illegible handwriting and misspellings. Many of the words might’ve been spelled differently during this time period, but they also could’ve been due to human error. I completed the transcriptions through trying to decode words in my mind to the best of my ability. My group members and I often compared different words with each other to try to fully figure them out. It was helpful to get other perspectives on words from my group members. When I finally figured out a word which I was confused about, it was the most satisfying feeling. Completing these transcriptions almost felt as if I was completing a jigsaw puzzle.

Original: http://moravian.bucknell.edu/memoirs/Samuel-Tippet/

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13MJaRyAwmMfOANP_Th0uo7URnXYOoho1psEbMa9MMOc/edit

My works (4,9,11,12):

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000754

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000759

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000761

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000762