Categories
Blog #2

Blog #2- Latrobe Analysis

Esther Latrobe was born in Bristol on June 7th, 1802. As a child, she faced many hardships with illness including the measles, but astonished doctors by persevering. At age 11 she lost her mom, and remained the only woman in her family along with her six brothers. She spent some of the best years of her life in Tytherton.  She taught for a while at the Ladies Boarding School in Tytherton; after her teaching stint she became devoted to the lord and spread his teachings.  She devoted her heart and soul to our saviour. She was also married and became the mother of a healthy boy. Shortly after giving birth she became severely ill and could not recover. She was not afraid of death and comforted her loved ones on her own death bed. She remained a happy spirit and had faith that she was joining the Lord. She was 28 when she passed away in the company of her husband, her baby boy, and other loved ones.

Contexts lets us see a handful of words to the left and right of the given term to see how the term is used in the document

Our research question is: how did Esther Latrobe’s relationship with God affect her lifestyle, and help her recover from such illnesses and hardships? Our approach of using Voyant can help us look at the research question to a certain extent, but I don’t think it can help us completely answer it. We can use these “visualization tools as a component in a larger interpretative process” (Whitley 189). For example, using tools like contexts or collocates allows us to see the surrounding text around words like “saviour” or “lord”. This could help us get a sense of how Esther viewed God throughout her life. Also, using cirrus could help see the most frequently used words, which will show us if topics like God and Lord are important throughout the whole text.  Tools like this are quicker and more direct than using more traditional humanistic means. However, in order to completely grasp how Esther’s hardships in life connected her with God I think it would be beneficial to look at the text through a closer reading. Like the Whitley reading points out, one way to analyze our text is to “step back and look at the broad patterns that emerge” (Whitley 188), but our research question might require looking at more detail. According to voyant, there are 8,460 total words and 1,793 total unique words in Esther Latrobe’s memoir. The most frequent words include “oh”, “lord”, “dear”, “god”, “let” and “saviour”. When looking at words like “lord” and “god” many of the collocates tend to be verbs suggesting that God plays an active role in Esther’s life.

The mandala tool shows key terms between the Latrobe and Tippett document

There were patterns across all texts like themes of religion and faith in God. For example, looking at Samuel Tippett’s memoir there were similar frequently used words like “saviour”, “lord”, and “dear”.  This shows that religion was a significant part of both of their lives. In contrast Tippett also focused on “time” and “love” whereas Latrobe seemed to devote more of her short life to her faith.

The cirrus tool creates a word cloud of the most frequently used words in the text

Using the tools Cirrus, trends, micro search, and bubble lines we can see certain patterns like the distribution of the words throughout the documents and the high frequency that these words appear. Platforms like voyant truly  “make visualizations function as interfaces in an iterative process that allows [scholars] to explore and tinker.” (Whitley 190)

 

 

Categories
Assignment #1

Latrobe Transcription

I found the overall process of digital text creation very interesting. I felt connected with the document since I analyzed each word on each page multiple times to make sure it was accurate, and that it made sense in context. It was very fascinating to learn about somebody else’s life this way.  The overall challenge was that people spoke and wrote differently back then, so I needed to adapt. There were many obstacles and challenges. First, many of the Latrobe pages were blurry so we had to contact the archivist in London to get clearer copies of the pages. Once this was done it was a lot smoother, but there were still some issues. I had to adjust to abbreviations and words in old English, and sometimes the handwriting was just difficult to read. I also had to remember to constantly save my work in case the window closed or the website crashed. With this project comes the pressure of making an utterly precise digital text since this is the first digital edition. Everything needs to be correct especially because we will be using other tools to examine these texts. I thought that I did well transcribing this kind of handwriting because I brushed up on my cursive last year. I originally learned script in fourth grade, but never really used it again except for my signature. However, last semester I was in a humanities course where our professor required us to hand write our journals in script, so it actually served as nice practice for this project. For certain letters that were hard to identify, I used the provided resource that showed the alphabet in old style cursive handwriting. If I was having trouble with a word or letter I would look at something I had already transcribed and compared it to that. I was also able to figure out some words in context. This process was very interesting, but very meticulous.

Latrobe Transcription Pages 15-21:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JskmdGh4grdhqHksXQmYSCRA0D3VlchO1ceAMjTDobo/edit

Page 15

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300031&scripto_doc_page_id=4000470

Page 16

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300031&scripto_doc_page_id=4000471

Page 17

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300031&scripto_doc_page_id=4000472

Page 18

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300031&scripto_doc_page_id=4000473

Page 19

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300031&scripto_doc_page_id=4000474

Page 20

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300031&scripto_doc_page_id=4000475

Page 21

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300031&scripto_doc_page_id=4000476

 

Categories
Blog #1

Blog #1: On Material and Digital Archives

Some advantages to creating a digital artifact from archival documents is that the digital artifact is more easily accessible and there is no to little risk of damaging the original artifact. Also, some documents could be written in handwriting that is hard for people of the twenty first century to follow along with, so a transcription will make it easier for users to actually read old documents. Additionally, these tools can help with, what Whitley calls, distant reading, which helps identify the overall interconnection between data. Once there is a transcription available you can use tools to manipulate and analyze the text for patterns that may not be obvious to the naked eye. Some of the disadvantages of digitization are the time and money that goes into the process of creating the digital artifacts. In addition, there is maintenance and upkeep involved in preserving these documents digitally. Technology is advancing all of the time, so it’s important to keep these sites updated. I noticed that The Moravian Lives project is similar to other large

Moravian Lives Project

-scale DH projects in a few ways. Both Moravian Lives and Old Weather has a place where people can get involved and transcribe materials themselves. Similar to the Jane Austen Manuscript project, you can access documents that were already transcribed and you can view the transcription and pictures of the original document. Also, the Quantifying Kissinger and Moravian Lives projects both have visualization maps that help people actually see the connections between the data. Yes, society as a whole is interacting with textual material on screen more than on the printed page. With the advancement of technology we have more accessibility to information and digital artifacts than ever. Research practices are changing because of this technology. Instead of looking up where a resource is located and dealing with the hard copy, now we can just look up whatever we need online and more often than not we will be able to find what we’re looking for. Open-source and free digitized materials offer new

 

Quantifying Kissinger Visualization Map

pedagogical opportunities. For example, we can take the digitized data and approach it a different way by using visualization tools. According to Whitley, these digital tools and visualizations produce more questions and problems than answers; this leads to an even deeper analysis of the data.  Students can reference and compile information from artifacts and centuries old documents that are located across the globe because they have digital access to them. According to Whitley, serendipitous discovery is possible in digital and physical form. In physical form, your perspective could be widened by a newspaper for example. Your eyes are drawn to different articles across the page prompting you to make new discoveries. On a digital platform, a search engine could help the user serendipitously find information that they might not have found on their own. Overall, all of these DH projects use tools that Whitley claims will, “challenge us to read texts differently than we otherwise would.”

 

 

 

Categories
Practice Blog

Analyzing DH Projects

I decided to focus on two of the sample DH projects: Jane Austen’s Fiction Manuscripts and the Belfast Group Poetry. The primary DH focus for Jane Austen’s Fiction Manuscripts seems to be preservation and archiving and the secondary focus is digital edition. These DH focuses were definitely the best methods for this type of subject matter. The website houses the original text through photos and it provides a transcribed version for an easier read. This is a great way to preserve the original writing while also creating a digital copy. Anybody worldwide can read Jane Austen’s manuscripts, the digital edition of these materials increases accessibility. Given the age and the fragility of Jane Austen’s physical text, archiving and digital edition is a no brainer.

A page of Jane Austen’s fiction in its digital form; it includes a photo of the original text with the transcribed digital edition.

The Belfast Group Poetry’s primary DH focus is networking and mapping. However, visualization plays a big role in this site as well, and can be considered the secondary DH focus. The Belfast Group refers to a weekly writing workshop founded by Philip Hobsbaum around 1955 and this project primarily uses networking maps to show all of the people that were involved in this group. Mapping and using visualization is definitely the best way to share this information. Instead of just simply listing who was involved and attended these workshops, the networking maps provide an interactive and exciting visual aid that displays all kinds of information. There are maps that show simply how these people were connected, there’s another one that shows who was involved with the group over the two time periods that the Belfast Group was up and running, and yet another that shows where the group members lived and worked. Since the main point of the site is to show the interconnections between group members, mapping these connections is the easiest way to represent the data.

One of the networking maps from Belfast Group Poetry that shows the people who were connected to this group.