Categories
Uncategorized

Blog #2

For our transcription project, we transcribed a memoir written by Elizabeth Grundy.  She wrote about her life, and how her mother died when she was young. She also mentioned how when she was married her husband died as well.  After this, her son, William, then died. She writes this memoir to tell us her difficult life and how she struggled to continue her belief in God and her faith.  My group and I transcribed her whole memoir, and throughout our process, we used Voyant tools to see how the words in the document are used and their frequency. We came up with a research question, and ours is, “How does the frequency of key terms change throughout the document?”  There are so many tools on Voyant that helped us answer this question. Three specific tools that we used that especially helped us were cirrus, streamgraph, and word tree. These three tools specialize on word frequency and that is why they were so accurate for our research. Cirrus is something that creates a word bubble based on the frequent words.  The bigger the words appear in the bubble, the most they appear in the document. This helps us to indicate the frequent words. In the Whitley reading, he also creates a cirrus called “Song of Myself”. He doesn’t call it a cirrus, he calls it a word cloud, but they are the exact same thing.  Below is an image of the cirrus that was created from our memoir words. 

The other two tools that we used that help us answer the other part of our question are stream graph and word tree.  Streamgraph shows the change of frequency for a specific word, throughout the whole document. This gives us the information we want by showing us the change throughout the memoir, instead of just in general. It also compares it to the other frequent words in that area of the document. For example, like in this quote, “Savior would raise you up even more;” she replied: “Do not keep me back, let me go freely; it will be best for me now; I want to be gone and to see my Dear Savior.”  You can see that Savior is used a lot in this certain part of the text, but right before this part, it isn’t used for a whole page. This shows how the key words change throughout the memoir. Similar to stream graph, in the Whitley reading, he mentions how he uses scatterplots to see the different patterns of data points on the different axises.  Below is an image of the streamgraph based off of the memoir.

The other tool, and the last one, that helped answer our question, was word tree, below. This tool shows the words that come before and after the key terms, or the collocate. 

This helps because it gives us the context of the key word, and it can even tell us when Elizabeth Grundy was saying at the point in the memoir.  Like in the Whitely reading, and in many other parts of writing, tools like these can be helpful for so many different things.

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Assignment #1

The Moravian Transcription assignment was something I had never done before.  I enjoyed it at first, I thought it was really cool being able to do this, but then it got much harder than I had anticipated.  I was in a group of 4 people, and my group and I split up the 17, or so pages.  We each did 5-6 pages, and at the end of the process we used each other for peer reading, having each other pick out the words we could not get.  The words were either written too messy or too small or I just did not recognize the words that were written. Every group had different writings. They were written in different time periods, and different people wrote them, so each could have either been easier or harder to read.  My process of transcribing the whole pages was to just write down the words I would translate and then leave question marks where I did not recognize, and then come back to them later. This allowed me to use the sentence around the words to help me find the word. Knowing the context made more sense.  I would then ask my groupmates or the professors walking around for help, asking if they could make out the world I was struggling with. The words that I could not transcribe usually would come up again. It was nice because I could look back at those words and know what it was. The texts had many mentions of Jesus, God, and savior.  I am Catholic so I enjoyed having this as the subject and I recognized these words and knew some of the stories told. I felt connected to the theme and plot of these transcriptions.  I learned to write in cursive in elementary school, but never really kept with it, so I still had trouble reading the cursive. 

 

Scripto: http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=user_document_pages

Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nv-N7N0rR6puaTNT2_QHv_918cxgYppQjCQikAxSNqQ/edit

Categories
Uncategorized

Blog #1

Having a digital artifact can be a really great thing.  It is extremely easy to access, no matter where you are.  It also will always be up, unless taken down by the owner.  I guess some disadvantages to making an artifact digital could be that someone who does not use technology could not access it.  Unless there is another way to access digital artifacts, then someone who is not technologically savvy would not be able to see or read it.  

  • Are we interacting with textual material on the screen more than on the (manuscript or printed) page, and if so, how are our research practices changing?

I believe that these days technology is such a big aspect of life.  Without technology, it is very hard to stay in loop with everything that happens around the world, and it is hard to stay in contact with other people.  I think that we are interacting with textual material on the screen more. There are still paper copies of textbooks and documents, but most books are all online, so it would be much easier to access that on the internet, so that is what most people do.  Because of this, research probably is changing more and more. It probably makes things easier having everything on your device, instead of a bunch of paper copies everywhere. This probably makes research easier because one can share their documents or notes to others by just emailing or sharing them online.  

  • Do digital versions of material texts highlight physical elements of texts that might otherwise pass unremarked?

On the subject of texts online, some might think that having these online, it would take away certain aspects of the textbook that could not be seen unless it was on paper.  Unless there is a textured page in the book, I do not think that that would be an issue. All of the writing and images would still be online, and having it online would probably make it even easier to read.  I think that having the text online would be pretty much the same as having it in front of you, reading wise.

  • What sources of knowledge and serendipitous discovery can be provided only in the physical archive? The digital archive?

Having archives digitized versus having the physical copy could have some differences.  If it is a handwritten document, the physical copy would allow you to feel the texture of the writing, and possibly the texture of an image that is hand drawn or painted.  This would allow one to possibly feel more connected to the archive, and it also could help a researcher find out more information about the document or artwork. Having something like this online would allow one to be able to read it more clearly because you can zoom in better online.  Also if the writing is blurry, there is technology that could make it clearer and easier to read.

This is an artifact that clearly has texture, so if this was digital versus the real copy, a researcher would be able to see and feel different things.

This paper artifact is something that would most likely not have texture, but it is clearly hard to read and is probably in a different language.  Having it digitized could help it become easier to read, and technology could probably easily translate it.

Categories
Practice Blog

Textual Analysis and Network Analysis

For my first practice blog post, I chose to write about textual analysis.  I always knew that textual analysis had to do with the examination of others and the way they interact in the world, but I was interested in learning how it had to do with digital humanities.  There are a bunch of different projects with the textual analysis tag. The relation to digital humanities that each project had, was that they included transcribing and records, such as historical.  These historical projects need to be passed down through generations in order to stay alive, so that involves a lot of transcribing. One of them was from 140 years ago, so that had to include a lot of rooting through cultures.  It also included maps which have to do with taking down what is shown.  This media below was from a diary written by David Livingstone and I picked it because it reminded me of the diary you mentioned in class that was very hard to read but they somehow found a way to transcribe it.

The second DH project I chose to write about was network analysis.  Pretty much all of the projects had visualization which is a major aspect of digital humanities.  One project was also on the textual analysis page, which I think makes sense because they obviously both involve analysis, and this project is a collection that holds a lot of information that is made to be easily found for historians.  This page also includes another map and it allows people to easily read it and easily analyze it.  This media below is called “The Six Degrees of Francis Bacon” and it shows things about his life.  I believe it tracks where he lived or traveled during a certain period of time on the map, so it shows that it is easy to see those different places.