Categories
Blog #2 Uncategorized

Esther Latrobe Voyant Tools

In Esther Latrobe’s memoir, as the reader, we learn that Esther Latrobe was born at Bristol on June 7th, 1802 into a loving family of five brothers and two parents. As she grew up she battled many illnesses such as the measles. To add to Esther’s rough upbringing, her mother passed when Esther was eleven years old. She then spent a lot of time in a dear place, Tytherton. She still had battles with illnesses such as rheumatic fever, which often required the Lord’s spirits to restore her as her medical assistants could not. Because of this attachment with her saviour she put her heart into the Lord. She had a deep connection with her faith that developed from a young age into her adulthood. Esther Latrobe then gave birth to a boy which caused her to become very sick. The way she connected with the Lord made her fear of death simmer. She felt comfort with her loved ones by her side as she faded into life with the Lord, death. She died at the age of 28.

With the use of Voyant Tools I was able to, as Frank Moretti states “step back and look at the broad patterns that emerge” (Whitley 188). These tools allowed me to see the most frequent words as well as the trends in the text. These tools gave me new perspective on the memoir including a broad view on the answer to our research question. Our research question was how did Esther Latrobe’s relationship with God affect her lifestyle, and help her recover from such illnesses and hardships. Seeing the frequency of the word “Lord” and “spirits” helped draw conclusions on how big an influence these had during this medical crisis of her life. Although it didn’t draw in specifically on how the Lord and spirits impacted her life as that would require a closer reading of her memoir, it was mentioned enough for the reader to realize that it played a big role.

 

With the ability of Voyant Tools I was able to see that the most frequent words were “lord”, “oh”, “dear”, “god” and “heart” (which is tied with “let” and “said”) respectively. Being able to see this showed what had the biggest influence in Esther’s life as she had the most to say about it. Even better, the context on Voyant Tools allows you to see to the left and right of the word which allows you to see the context of the Lord in Esther’s life. Being able to see every single occurrence of the word allows you to see much more than the human eye could pick up on. Also the list allows you to compare each occurrence of the word on a visual chart in a very efficient matter that the human could not do alone.

Using the available tools in Voyant Tools helps “identify the patterns of meaning in large and potentially unwieldy texts” (Whitley 198). Word clouds allow you to “spatially read a large body of text involving an interesting back-and-forth between close and distant reading” (Whitley 200). Having these tools helped draw large conclusions about the text which mainly relate back to her beliefs about Lord. Along with Tippett’s memoir, the Lord impacted the lives of many of this time period which shows how important religion was. “Lord” and “Saviour” were frequently used in both memoirs. Using visual tools such as bubblelines, wordcloud, cirrus, bubbles, and frequency grids provides visualizations about the text without reading the entire text. Being able to draw conclusions helps analyze not only Esther’s memoir but also all Moravian memoirs and that time period as a whole. 

Categories
Assignment #1

Latrobe Transcription

Transcribing the Latrobe Memoirs was a new experience for me. Being so up close with each and every word that was being transcribed made it easier to search for the overall meaning. As a modern reader, I am used to reading books and articles with big ideas, and almost skimming each line. However this process was new for me as each page, sentence, word, and letter carried an importance. These sentences provided an insight into an unexplored life.

This process of transcribing started out bumpy as the memoir documents were blurry and quite hard to read. Zooming in made the letters in the entire word blend together making it illegible. Professor Faull was able to quickly contact an archivist in London to receive clearer pictures. Thankfully we received a quick response. This made the process easier as zooming in on a cursive word made it easier to transcribe because of the improved clarity. I also believe that my inference skills were improved as some words were not transcribable therefore based on the context of the sentence my teammates and I were able to guess the word. Another challenge was transcribing abbreviations. Because we no longer write with these abbreviations, going back to the lists of abbreviations from this time period was the only way I could transcribe accurately.

Accuracy was key as we were supposed to be typing someone else’s words, not making up our own. Therefore getting these pages as close to perfect with a few sets of eyes starting with my own, then my teammates, and if need be Professor Faull. Looking so close at these memoirs has given me a new perspective on someone else’s life. I enjoyed this process very much as it was different from everything I’ve done in the past and I learned many new skills and ideas.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JskmdGh4grdhqHksXQmYSCRA0D3VlchO1ceAMjTDobo/edit

 

 

Categories
Blog #1

Blog #1

The relationship between technology and digital archives is linear. As our society modernizes we turn to technology more than ever before. With that being said, our society is now the most efficient it has ever been. Digital artifacts is an example of how much more efficient our society is, in ways we probably never expected.

With one click we can see a variety of data presented in graphs, charts, tables and maps. Digital artifacts can draw conclusions in the form of visuals that physical words cannot. The variety of visuals “help us to perceive patterns in data that we might otherwise miss” (187). As Whitley says, “they challenge us to read texts differently than we otherwise would” (186). Digital artifacts open the door to a lot more than words can and ever will. Although Whitley addresses that some literature scholars may argue that words are considered data, cognitively words cannot conclude the same patterns that visuals can.

Digital artifacts have many advantages as they can reach a much larger population in a short amount of time. The accessibly is increased to anyone who is interested and has internet available. Those who are interested don’t have to travel to these physical artifact sights, they can simply find the information they need in a couple of clicks at most.

However this lowers the value of the physical artifact. The historical value is lost as all the information is taken from it and displayed for anyone interested online. I believe that as our society is advancing we are losing value in physical objects. Is this necessarily good or bad? I am not sure. I believe there should be some value in the physicality of objects and artifacts. Seeing the true artifact is rare and much more moving than seeing the same words typed in the same font online. The general population is starting to lose this attachment to physical objects because of the benefits and normality of having digital copies so accessible.

Having the same information, if not more, available online is much more efficient and productive. This shift towards digital value does shape our interests. There is a bigger focus on developing the skills needed with technology. There are computer sufficiency exams for many jobs and education programs as well as a push towards computer science and technology based skills. Because of the massive amount of jobs that need to be filled, the push towards these majors has increased. Years ago, computer science and digital humanities was not anywhere near the popularity it currently is. These areas of interest are constantly increasing as the need for them is growing.

There are many jobs available to continue to digitize our world. This can be seen as a disadvantage because of the amount of money it costs to change artifacts into accessible digital artifacts. It is an economic investment that will pay off in the long run. After exploring the Moravian Lives website as well as the Old Weather project, a similarity I found was that they both are crowdsourcing. This search for large groups of people to help with a project is an example of how the public is being asked to help modernize our world.

 

The opportunities that the use of digital artifacts brings to our society seem to outweigh the disadvantages. I believe we should continue to use the technological advantages to benefit us but to keep using printed sources for certain aspects of life.

Categories
Practice Blog

Practice Blog 8/28- Carly Pavoni

I explored visualization and mapping as sample projects of digital humanities. Visualization is an important aspect of digital humanities because “digital visualizations will accelerate the reading process by allowing readers to access that portion of the mind that processes information spatially rather than sequentially (“Visualizing,” 445). SelfieCity is a modern digital humanities project conducted by Dr. Lev Manovich. It is a project used to explore the demographics, expressions, and positions of selfie takers. Visualization is used in the SelfieCity project in order to efficiently display information to an audience through graphs, charts, and collages. The collage of pictures used to show the different poses, separated by city, makes it very easy to draw conclusions about the popularity of poses per each city. SelfieCity also uses graphs to display the gender and expressions of the selfie takers. This makes it easy to read what is more popular among certain demographics.

SelfieCenter visualizations
MoEML

In the project The Map of Early Modern London mapping is used to display a reliable map that was put together from four sources. Digital mapping puts together a visual image “whose meaning can be quickly apprehended by the brain’s natural propensity for spatial recognition” (“The American Literature Scholar in the Digital Age”, 194). This visual map allows students and researchers a gate to continue inquiries relating to early modern London that wouldn’t have been accessible before. This will allow us to learn more about London’s history. This mapping is a form of visualization that doesn’t require words, therefore our brains can process this information quickly.