Categories
Blog #2

Blog #2

The full transcription which I entered into Voyant had a total of 3,807 words with 796 unique word forms. There are an average of 1,269 words per sentence. Visualization tools like Voyant make texts much more understandable. Our Moravian memoirs were challenging to grasp, and so using Voyant helped me greatly. Voyant allowed me to interact with the text in a new way and helped me to answer our research question of how religion and faith play a role in Samuel Tippet’s transcription. The Cirrus word cloud and the Corpus Terms allowed me to view the frequency of words in the text. The most frequent words in the corpus are heart, times, time, poor and love. The Cirrus word cloud presents frequently used words in  larger text for emphasis. This is a practice of spatial reading, which I found to be very helpful. Seeing texts in visual form allowed me to view the text more clearly. As Whitley explains, “such visualizations help us to perceive patterns in data that we might otherwise miss” (187). The Corpus Terms provided me with data that showed exactly how many times each word was used in the document. It was interesting to see that the word “heart” was used 31 times and that “Jesus” was used 13 times. These tools exposed the very religious nature of the text. “You find your perspective broadened through a series of unexpected discoveries” (185). Through Voyant, I was able to participate in Distant Reading, a concept explained in the Whitley text. Through Distant Reading, I was able to make connections and see the greater picture rather than closely reading every text and miss important aspects of the memoir. I might not have been able to draw such conclusions about Tippet’s memoir through reading it plainly without Voyant. These tools “challenge us to read texts differently than we otherwise would” (186).  The bubble tool shows the key words which are most frequently used as the ones with biggest bubbles which makes it easy to visualize rather than reading terms off of a list. I like the visualization tools because they allow me to understand the information better.

Tippet was born in 1711 in the Parish of Bitton. He discusses his struggles in his family life. His father died when he was quite young, and he relied on God to get him through this massive loss.  It seems that he is troubled and due to some dark statements throughout the piece.  He mentions that he, “wishes he was never born”. He criticizes himself extensively and describes his reliance on God in order to move past issues in his earlier life. By asking ourselves the question of ‘how does religion and faith play a role in Samuel Tippet’s transcription’ we are able to analyze and understand the writing better. This question also helped us to compare Samuel Tippet’s memoir to Esther Latrobe’s memoir. For the Esther Latrobe memoir, the key terms were lord, dear, god, let and savior which is why our research question on religion pertains to their piece as well. The key terms for the pieces combined are Lord,time, heart, dear, and oh. The many tools available in Voyant allowed me to analyze and understand these memoirs. Tippet’s memoir is much shorter than Latrobe’s. Latrobe’s memoir is a much longer piece with 8,460 words. Using some of the tools such as terms berry, tells the Voyant user that the word ‘God’ was used 26 times in the Latrobe memoir.

http://humn10001fa2018.courses.bucknell.edu/files/2018/09/voyant-screenshot1.pdf

http://humn10001fa2018.courses.bucknell.edu/files/2018/09/voyant-screenshot2.pdf

http://humn10001fa2018.courses.bucknell.edu/files/2018/09/voyant-screenshot3.pdf

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Assignment #1

I found transcribing these pieces of work to be a very fascinating process. I have never completed a project like this before. I think that this project has given us an incredible opportunity. We have been given the chance to create digital artifacts from real journal entries. I found this project to be very special and meaningful. I really enjoyed reading the journal entries and being able to read them felt very personal. I imagined how long ago these were written and by who. There is something very personal about interpreting someone’s journal entries, especially for the first time. There were many deep emotions that were touched on in the texts which made me feel a connection to the work.

It was great to learn about these people of the Moravian church through their writing. From their writings, they seem to be very religious. It is unbelievable to think about the circumstances under which these entries were written and how different people’s lives are today. Reading these texts and transcribing them was a very intriguing process. It was quite difficult, yet allowed me to appreciate what I was doing even moreso. There were many words I was unable to read due to illegible handwriting and misspellings. Many of the words might’ve been spelled differently during this time period, but they also could’ve been due to human error. I completed the transcriptions through trying to decode words in my mind to the best of my ability. My group members and I often compared different words with each other to try to fully figure them out. It was helpful to get other perspectives on words from my group members. When I finally figured out a word which I was confused about, it was the most satisfying feeling. Completing these transcriptions almost felt as if I was completing a jigsaw puzzle.

Original: http://moravian.bucknell.edu/memoirs/Samuel-Tippet/

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13MJaRyAwmMfOANP_Th0uo7URnXYOoho1psEbMa9MMOc/edit

My works (4,9,11,12):

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000754

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000759

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000761

http://moravian.bucknell.edu/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=300045&scripto_doc_page_id=4000762

Categories
Uncategorized

Blog #1

One of the greatest uses of modern technology is the ability to create digital artifacts from archival documents. Archival documents are defined as “ information that serve as evidence of past events. They record information about past activities and act as memory aids that allow its users to recall and relive them or to re-communicate information about those events at some point in the future.” Archival documents are incredibly precious and interesting. They give us important information and keep us conscious of our past. However, it is so incredibly vital to transition these archives into digital artifacts. A digital artifact is defined as “an artifact that is of a digital nature or creation. For example, a gif is such an artifact. Digital artifact can be of any content types including text, audio, video, image, animation or a combination.” Digital material lives on and is stored for forever, whereas archives have the potential to be destroyed in some way or another. It is of the utmost importance that the archives be protected against any potential harm. Therefore, creating digital artifacts is one of the most productive uses of time and resources we have today.

 

Technology is so beneficial in many ways, however, its ability to create digital artifacts from archival documents is one of its best uses.  As a society, we interact with textual material on the screen more than printed material. Therefore, having archives digitized is simply more practical for viewing purposes. Similarly, it seems that our physical and emotional relationships to our objects of study have changed in this digital age. People seem to be less connected to or emotionally invested in things that are digital. There is some type of barrier that comes along with viewing content digitally versus through printed text. While converting archival documents to digitized materials is superior for mass viewing, it does not supplant our need to view the physical originals. Anyone who is serious in studying the matter or understanding it more thoroughly should definitely still view the physical originals due to the innate differences in viewing. I think that digital mediums of viewing cannot replace those of physical nature. There is nothing like viewing something first hand. On the contrast, digital mediums can be helpful in pinpointing details of an archive that may have gone overlooked if otherwise been viewed in printed form. This said, I think that it is important to create online reading interfaces that can more closely approximate the experience of reading physical materials.

 

Creating digital artifacts from archival documents is a great aspect of many projects such as “Jane Austen’s Manuscripts”. The manuscripts of Austen’s are very important to preserve. Jane Austen’ work is classic and deserves to live on through the digitized form. “Many of the Austen manuscripts are frail; open and sustained access has long been impossible for conservation and location reasons. Digitization at this stage in their lives not only offers the opportunity for the virtual reunification of a key manuscript resource, it will also be accompanied by a record in as complete a form as possible of the conservation history and current material state of these manuscripts to assist their future conservation.” Austen’s work being digitized is a prime example of the importance of conserving works for the future.

url.jpg

url.jpg

Categories
Uncategorized

Allison Butler’s Practice Post 8/28

I chose textual analysis and visualization for my two sample projects of DH. Textual analysis is a major aspect of many of Professor Faull’s projects. For example, Transcribe Bentham is an “award winning collaborative transcription initiative, which is digitising and making available digital images of Bentham’s unpublished manuscripts through a platform…”. Additionally, textual analysis is greatly important in The Great Parchment Book. It was “…damaged as a result of a fire at Guildhall in 1786, it has been unavailable to researchers for over 200 years.” Textual analysis is also very present in Micki Kaufman’s project, “this project is an application of ‘big data’ computational text analysis techniques to research the Digital National Security Archive (DNSA)’s recently released Kissinger Collections, comprising approximately 17500 meeting memoranda (‘memcons’) and teleconference transcripts (‘telcons’)”. Visualization is also a main aspect of many projects such as SelfieCity by Professor Faull. Visualization allowed researchers to analyze cultural differences through selfies. This is extremely interesting and allows us to compare and contrast cultural norms. Visualization is also a vital part of Mapping the Republic of Letters. Visualization allows us to better understand the “…networks of correspondence that stretched across countries and continents; the social networks created by scientific academies; and the physical networks brought about by travel”.

posegrid_bangkok_.jpg

great-parchment-book-028-small.jpg